2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. (152 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 291 kg more than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. (285 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac STS 1992 Chrysler Le Baron
Make Cadillac Chrysler
Model STS Le Baron
Year Released 2009 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3599 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 302 HP 152 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 285 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 7.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1344 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2560 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]