2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1993 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (300 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 637 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (273 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1993 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | STS | ES |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 273 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2470 mm |