2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1994 Rover 100
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 100 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1994 Rover 100. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 765 kg more than 1994 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1994 Rover 100 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | STS | 100 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 369 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |