2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1996 Acura SLX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura SLX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura SLX would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (321 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1996 Acura SLX. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura SLX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 245 kg more than 1996 Acura SLX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Acura SLX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 1996 Acura SLX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | STS | SLX |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4661 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2761 mm |
