2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 535 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | STS | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 369 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |