2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch weights approximately 415 kg more than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | STS | Swatch |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2860 mm |
