2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 10 kg more than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | STS | Challenger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2730 mm |