2009 Cadillac STS vs. 1998 Rover 420

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 446 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover 420 has manual transmission. 1998 Rover 420 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: