2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2000 TVR Tamora
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 TVR Tamora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 TVR Tamora would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 TVR Tamora (334 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac STS. (302 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 TVR Tamora should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac STS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 405 kg more than 2000 TVR Tamora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 TVR Tamora (514 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac STS. (369 Nm). This means 2000 TVR Tamora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 2000 TVR Tamora | |
| Make | Cadillac | TVR |
| Model | STS | Tamora |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3599 cc | 3598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 334 HP |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 514 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1230 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 57 L |
