2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2001 Suzuki SX

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki SX. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki SX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 99 kg more than 2001 Suzuki SX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (427 Nm) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.

Compare all specifications: