2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2002 Chrysler Concorde

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. (251 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 17 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. (340 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Concorde.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac STS 2002 Chrysler Concorde
Make Cadillac Chrysler
Model STS Concorde
Year Released 2009 2002
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3599 cc 3516 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 302 HP 251 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 340 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 3900 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 9.9:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1618 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 5280 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]