2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2002 Chrysler Sebring

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (200 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 25 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Sebring.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac STS 2002 Chrysler Sebring
Make Cadillac Chrysler
Model STS Sebring
Year Released 2009 2002
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3599 cc 2736 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 302 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 4300 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1610 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]