2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 925 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | STS | Minica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2350 mm |