2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2003 Opel Signum

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Signum. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Signum would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2003 Opel Signum. (173 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Signum. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 140 kg more than 2003 Opel Signum. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Signum, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Signum. (280 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Signum.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac STS 2003 Opel Signum
Make Cadillac Opel
Model STS Signum
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3599 cc 1910 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 302 HP 173 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 280 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1495 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.1 L/100km 6.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 9.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 58 L