2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
Model | STS | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 1779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2320 mm |