2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (296 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 27 kg more than 2009 Cadillac STS.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (427 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac STS. (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac STS. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac STS 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Cadillac Ford
Model STS Mustang
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3599 cc 4606 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 302 HP 296 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 427 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1662 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 59 L