2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden UTE would be higher. Both 2009 Cadillac STS and 2008 Holden UTE are equipped with a 3,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2008 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden UTE. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2008 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | STS | UTE |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 369 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |