2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser
To start off, both 2009 Cadillac STS and 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (320 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (427 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | STS | PT Dream Cruiser |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4564 cc | 2397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 178 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 210 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |