2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac STS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | STS | Caprice |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 369 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |