2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac STS would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac STS. (302 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac STS. (369 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac STS. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2011 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 2011 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | STS | UTE |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3599 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
