2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac STS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 74 kg more than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac STS. (369 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac STS. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2013 Ferrari California has manual transmission. 2013 Ferrari California will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
| Model | STS | California |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 78 L |
