2009 Cadillac STS vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac STS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 365 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Roadster has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac STS | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | STS | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.2 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |
