2009 Cadillac XLR vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Cadillac XLR is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 1147 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac XLR (423 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac XLR | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | XLR | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 423 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2010 mm |