2009 Cadillac XLR vs. 2000 Hummer H2
To start off, 2009 Cadillac XLR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Hummer H2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Hummer H2 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac XLR (321 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Hummer H2. (316 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2000 Hummer H2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Hummer H2 weights approximately 1268 kg more than 2009 Cadillac XLR.
Because 2000 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hummer H2 (488 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac XLR. (420 Nm). This means 2000 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac XLR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac XLR | 2000 Hummer H2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
| Model | XLR | H2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 316 HP |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 488 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2903 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2070 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3130 mm |
