2009 Cadillac XLR vs. 2003 Lexus RX

To start off, 2009 Cadillac XLR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lexus RX would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac XLR (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2003 Lexus RX. (198 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2003 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lexus RX weights approximately 230 kg more than 2009 Cadillac XLR.

Because 2003 Lexus RX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lexus RX. (284 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lexus RX.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac XLR 2003 Lexus RX
Make Cadillac Lexus
Model XLR RX
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 321 HP 198 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 284 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1865 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2620 mm