2009 Cadillac XLR vs. 2005 Lada 110
To start off, 2009 Cadillac XLR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lada 110 would be higher. At 4,369 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac XLR (444 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 354 more horse power than 2005 Lada 110. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2005 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 606 kg more than 2005 Lada 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lada 110. 2009 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 2005 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 2005 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac XLR | 2005 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | XLR | 110 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4369 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 561 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1721 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 43 L |
