2009 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche (307 HP) has 258 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche (335 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Avalanche | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Avalanche | Cortina |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 335 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 50 L |