2009 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche (307 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (98 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (188 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Avalanche | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Avalanche | Sigma |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 335 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |