2009 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. (287 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 511 kg more than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. (407 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Avalanche 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Chevrolet Mitsubishi
Model Avalanche Lancer
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5300 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 16 cylinders
Engine Type V W
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 310 HP 287 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 454 Nm 407 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.7:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2141 kg 1630 kg
Vehicle Length 5630 mm 4495 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1950 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.8 L/100km 8.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 16.8 L/100km 12.6 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]