2009 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo (105 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Because 1968 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo (106 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Aveo | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Aveo | 1300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2430 mm |