2009 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (130 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo. (104 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (137 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Aveo | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Aveo | 323 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |