2009 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 2001 Daewoo Vada
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. Both 2009 Chevrolet Aveo and 2001 Daewoo Vada are equipped with a 1,598 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Vada (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo. (104 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 236 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo (145 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 2009 Chevrolet Aveo has manual transmission. 2009 Chevrolet Aveo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Aveo | 2001 Daewoo Vada | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
Model | Aveo | Vada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1313 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2530 mm |