2009 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 24 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Aveo | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Aveo | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |