2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1942 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 3,137 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1942 Skoda Superb. (79 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1942 Skoda Superb. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 45 kg more than 1942 Skoda Superb. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Skoda Superb. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1942 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Captiva | Superb |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 3137 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |