2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 716 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
| Model | Captiva | A6G |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 550 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2290 mm |
