2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1965 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1965 Pontiac Tempest. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1965 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 495 kg more than 1965 Pontiac Tempest. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Pontiac Tempest. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1965 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pontiac |
Model | Captiva | Tempest |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 3522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2930 mm |