2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1966 Mazda Familia
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (135 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1966 Mazda Familia. (57 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1966 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 471 kg more than 1966 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mazda Familia. (81 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1966 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Captiva | Familia |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |