2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
| Model | Captiva | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
