2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (227 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 815 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (297 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Captiva | 929 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3195 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 297 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1965 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |
