2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1983 Skoda L
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1983 Skoda L | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | Captiva | L |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 38 L |
