2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 157 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Captiva | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |