2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (110 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (221 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (126 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Captiva | 323 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 78.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |