2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1993 Mazda 626

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 1993 Mazda 626
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Captiva 626
Year Released 2009 1993
Body Type SUV Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2405 cc 1989 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 60 L