2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1996 Mazda 121

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (135 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 197 kg more than 1996 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 1996 Mazda 121
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Captiva 121
Year Released 2009 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2405 cc 1753 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 135 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1261 kg 1064 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 3830 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2460 mm