2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 1996 Rover 400

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.

Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 1996 Rover 400
Make Chevrolet Rover
Model Captiva 400
Year Released 2009 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2405 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2560 mm