2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2001 Mazda B2500

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 474 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda B2500.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 2001 Mazda B2500
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Captiva B2500
Year Released 2009 2001
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2405 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 194 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Weight 1266 kg 1740 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2990 mm