2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Windstar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Captiva | Windstar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3066 mm |
