2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 81 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Chevrolet Jeep
Model Captiva Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2405 cc 3966 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 195 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 312 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 8.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1845 kg 1764 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.6 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 78 L