2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2003 Tata Safari

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Tata Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Tata Safari would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2003 Tata Safari. (135 HP @ 5530 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Tata Safari weights approximately 195 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata Safari. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata Safari.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 2003 Tata Safari
Make Chevrolet Tata
Model Captiva Safari
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1990 cc 1948 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5530 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1845 kg 2040 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2660 mm