2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2005 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2009 Chevrolet Captiva has manual transmission. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Captiva | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2490 mm |